What you prefer to develop your next project with? PHP, Javascript, or Python?

Laravel Vs. Django Vs. Node — Which one is better?

Get the best software development with Laravel, Django, and Node.

Now, this is pretty hard! Sounds much like PHP Vs. Python Vs JavaScript (to be precise).

Nonetheless, we take this as a challenge and let’s see what each has in store for us.

Background

Laravel, Django, and node, all three of them are frameworks that help in development activities. Meaning that disregarding the language they are based upon, all end up achieving the same objective, and that is to develop a web application. What leads to the comparison is the fact that:

• Laravel is a PHP framework, free and open-source enabling developers to use the pattern of MVC for development needs.
• Django is a Python-based framework allowing developers to use a systematic approach for the development process
• Node, on the other hand, is a JavaScript runtime environment used for cross-platform development needs.

So are you wondering which is the best back-end framework amongst Laravel vs Django or Django vs Node.js or Laravel vs Node.js? It seems like a difficult choice to choose from. So, let’s deep dive and let me get you through an in-depth comparison of Laravel vs Django vs Node.

Now that each has different ideologies yet working to attain similar results, knowing which is best and under what aspect is worthy enough to draft a comparison. And to do so, we will discuss in detail each of them, finally concluding on which of three would serve your purpose best.

Django

Until 2005, no one ever would think about having a web development framework based on Python. Fast forward to a decade now, Django is at the heart of many developers. From Instagram to Mozilla, Pinterest, and Bitbucket, you would many using Django for the development of web applications. Developed, owned by Django Software Foundation, the framework is light weighted and equipped with plenty of features to be deployed in web applications. What makes the framework special is the ease provided by the same to seamlessly integrate solutions to cut down on the development time.

It sounds like Django has its way to enhance the development process by adding greater features and at the same time, lowering the time to market of the developed application. Having said that let’s move ahead and see what are the positives and the negatives of using Django as the next development framework for your web application.

Pros

• Does not allow security breaches within the developed application.
• Seamless collaboration with relational databases.
• Has an easy learning curve.
• Speeds up the entire process of development.
• High scalability
• Backed up by huge support from the user community.
• Detailed and crisp documentation.

Cons

• One thing that prevents developers from using Django is the fact that it is monolithic, which means that it is a single-tiered software application.
• Django does not work well with small-scale apps.
• Mandates having expertise in the language before its implementation.

Laravel

Released years after Django, Laravel was developed and created by Taylor and Otwell. In order to work on Laravel, it is important that developers have sound knowledge about PHP, even if not at an advanced level, basic knowledge is needed. Laravel has inbuilt features that ease most of the development process, reducing the development time. Most of the applications built using Laravel are for the content management system.

Furthermore, it is seen that Laravel has to upscale features that help gain traffic and drive it towards the website. Whether you are working on a new website from scratch or planning to upgrade an existing, Laravel is the powerhouse of features that help you in all phases of web development. Build impressive websites using features of Laravel and keeps your website one step ahead, gaining a cutting edge in the competitive market.

Pros

• The ideal choice of framework for PHP developers.
• Simple and easy to learn with descriptive documentation making it the best of PHP and Laravel.
• Based on the MVC pattern, it eliminates the need for writing basic HTML codes.
• Supported by ORM, helps in abstraction and automation of the model part.
• Easy integration of logic within the website using the blade template engine
• Encompasses features of dependency injection, enabling easy testing and automating.

Cons

• It does not have inbuilt tools and requires third-party integration for custom website development.
• Laravel is pretty slow, and developers need to be adept in PHP before working on Laravel.

Node JS

Well, if you talk about Node js, we believe it is not a framework but a server. Based on JavaScript, Node embeds all the features of the above, meaning that no more multi-threading and not meant for the beginners. So, what is the node?

Node JS in a fundamental sense is a JavaScript server that primarily acts as a server-side browser. It is open-source and facilitates the development of cross-platform web applications. Given the fact that node runs on a single thread, it eliminates any sort of blocking during the execution. Also, it has an event-driven and asynchronous I/O APIs. One of the primary reasons why developers prefer working on Node is the fact that it works on a single thread. The entire server is event-based and triggered on receiving callbacks. This enables the server to come back every time it is called and prevents it from being a pause or in a sleep state.

Pros

• Node JS has extended support in the form of libraries.
• Overall performance of application developed using node is higher than others
• Works best when you need to build APIs.
• Node comes along with an excellent package manager.
• Receives tremendous support from the user community.
• Quick and easy handling of users’ concurrent requests.

Cons

• The fact that node js involves asynchronous programming, not all developers find it easy to understand and could be difficult to work with.
• It does not work well with CPU intensive apps because of its feature of being single-threaded.
• Callbacks lead to tons of nested callbacks.

Comparison

So now that we have seen what each of the framework/servers has in bed to offer us, let have a quick comparison made between them, taking into consideration the different aspects of development.

1. Code Node

var http = require('http'); http.createServer(function (req, res) res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' }); res.end('Hello World!'); }).listen(8080);

Django

from django.http import HttpResponse def hello(request): return HttpResponse("Hello world")

Laravel

< ?PHP /* |-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Web Routes |-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Here, registering of web routes for your application, loaded | by the RouteServiceProvider within a group comprising | 'web' middleware group happens. You can start | creating now. */ Route::get('/', function () { return view('welcome'); });

2. Scalability & Performance

Where node js ranks high in performance, Django has its way being scalable with Laravel having a set of features that can keep your website one step ahead in the market.

3. Architecture

Django has an MVT architecture where Laravel follows an MVC pattern. On the other hand, the node is event-driven.

4. Security

Django is the best when it comes to security with Laravel next. However, despite the fact that the node is pretty famous, it could have holes and remain unnoticed for a longer time period.

5. Customizability

Being backed by JavaScript, node js has the maximum customization options, whereas Django calls for a lot more complexities when one needs customization. Laravel, on the contrary, needs third party tools to add and personalize the website.

Verdict

We have seen all three separately and in conjunction. Now, which one should you choose and opt for depends on your specific requirements as we have developers for both the technologies, and upon your convenience you can hire node.js developer or hire Laravel developer depends on your project requirements. Remember, one might be better than the other, but the decision has to be made on which one maps your needs best.